Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mayo and city staff present Granger Linear Park plan; neighbors press for artifacts, buried utilities and oversight
Summary
City staff and Mayo Clinic updated the council on the Granger Linear Park/site-development plan; Mayo said it will incorporate recovered Lourdes High School materials (an estimated portion used on-site), but neighbors sought clearer artifact lists, confirmation on buried utilities (not planned) and stronger neighborhood engagement.
City staff and Mayo Clinic representatives provided an informational briefing on July 6 about the Granger Linear Park and related site development plan for the Bold Forward/Unbound campus. The presentation did not seek council action but prompted substantial questions about artifacts, landscaping, timeline and community engagement.
Staff described the site development plan agreement process and noted that Mayo posted financial security for landscape elements not finalized at the time of conditional approval. The park’s width has increased from the original concept (from 30 to about 47.5 feet in parts of the design), and staff said final landscape plans were submitted in late June and are under iterative review.
Karen Feniman Killinger (Mayo) described three park zones (reflective, green/play space, and a plaza/stage area), explained how some stone and banding from the demolished Lourdes High School will be reused in benches and a commemorative wall, and said Mayo had stored recovered materials for reuse or repurposing. "We wanted to focus and be very intentional about honoring it as the high school location," she said, and estimated that under 25% of recovered material might be used on-site, with other pieces reserved or used on adjacent utility structures.
Neighbors and several council members asked for more transparency: what exact materials count as 'artifacts,' how many are incorporated, and whether the power lines at the site will be buried. Staff and Mayo said the current plan does not include burying overhead power lines and that lighting and lighting plans are available in the submitted site-development packet. Council members pressed for more public renderings and for clearer commitments on the timeline and the financial security that ensures Mayo completes promised public-realm elements.
Staff emphasized that the site-development plan process is quasi-judicial and that staff review focuses on conformity with the Unified Development Code; the presentation included assurances that the council’s March 2024 motion (removal of Lourdes High School from the historic inventory and Mayo’s commitment to a linear park) is being considered as staff completes final design review.
