Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables proposed zoning overhaul after hours of public comment
Summary
After more than an hour of public testimony from residents, developers and architects, Fairhope City Council voted to table proposed zoning ordinance amendments indefinitely (minimum 60 days) to allow additional outreach and revisions.
The Fairhope City Council on March 9 delayed action on a wide-ranging amendment to the city zoning ordinance after extended public comment and council discussion.
Council President (speaker S1) opened the public-hearing portion of the meeting and noted the intent to consider final adoption of the planning-and-zoning amendment. Dozens of residents, property owners, developers and architects urged changes or urged the council to withdraw the measure, arguing it had not received adequate notice and that some provisions would create unintended consequences for established neighborhoods and the Central Business District.
Developer Trey Cordy said a convening of local professionals could resolve technical drafting problems and asked the council to “sit down with us and let us resolve these issues.” Fred Grenade, a longtime resident, called the draft “a one-size-fits-all approach” that would undercut local character and said the historic commission and major landowners had not been consulted. Several architects and business owners urged clearer graphics and illustrations to explain the ordinance language to nontechnical residents.
Council members said they had heard the public and staff and that the ordinance contained some provisions with unintended impacts — notably provisions affecting planned-unit developments (PUDs) and a commercial-content percentage that critics said would be infeasible for some sites. Councilman Burrell (S6) said tabling would allow staff and volunteers to bring forward refined language and examples; Councilman Robinson (S14) said the broader goals — reducing density, addressing stormwater runoff and preserving the CBD — remain council priorities.
The motion before the council was to table the amendment indefinitely but not for less than 60 days, to permit a structured engagement process with architects, developers, homeowners and planning staff. The motion passed by voice vote; the clerk called the question and recorded council members’ affirmative voices. No final adoption or ordinance changes were approved at the meeting.
Next steps: council members and planning staff said they will organize a public forum and distribute revised draft language for comment; staff asked citizens who want direct updates to email planning@fairhopeal.gov to be added to a mailing list.
