Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate sweeping ban on corporate political expenditures; critics warn of constitutional and enforcement risks
Summary
SB 461 would bar corporations from making political expenditures unless through a political committee; supporters framed it as reducing money in politics, while opponents warned it could curtail political speech and empower administrative dissolution as a remedy.
The committee debated Senate Bill 461, which would prohibit state-formed or foreign corporations doing business in Connecticut from making political expenditures except through a political committee established for that purpose. The chair summarized the JFS language incorporating feedback from the Secretary of the State’s office on enforcement notifications.
Senator Sampson delivered an extended critique, arguing the bill "blurs some lines" and risks running afoul of Supreme Court precedent on political speech. He cautioned the proposal could effectively allow an administrative agency to dissolve corporations for certain communications and said the provision was "beyond vague," warning of significant legal exposure and litigation risk.
Representative Gauthier countered that corporations should not be treated as persons with equivalent political rights, saying, "Corporations are not people," and expressed support for the bill as a tool to remove money from the political system.
Members requested further review of statutory definitions—particularly the definition of "expenditure" in existing law—and the chair offered to continue conversations to seek areas of consensus around definitions and remedies. The clerk called the roll on the motion to JFS; the committee recorded votes and held them open for final confirmation.
