Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District hears $39M–$53M facilities estimate from Energy System Group

Orchard View Schools Board of Education · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Energy System Group presented a consolidated facilities study to the Orchard View Schools board estimating $39 million to $53 million in work across district buildings and offering a priority matrix to guide upgrades and maintenance.

Orchard View Schools received a facilities study update on March 9, 2026, when Energy System Group representatives reviewed districtwide needs and a Consolidated Priority Matrix intended to guide capital planning. The consultants said completing the full scope of recommended work across Orchard View Elementary (OVEE), Cardinal, Orchard View Middle School (OVMS), Orchard View High School (OVHS) and Orchard View Child Education (OVCE) would cost an estimated $39 million to $53 million.

Terry and Paul from Energy System Group presented the study results and a priority matrix that aggregates items identified in three facility assessments (including prior studies in 2016 and 2024). The matrix flags projects mentioned in all three studies versus those in one or two, a structure the presenters said would help district leaders sequence work.

District staff involved in the study included Superintendent Tom Hamilton and facilities staff including Jack Timmer. The presentation noted the estimate reflects a consolidated, full-project scope; the board did not adopt funding decisions at the meeting.

Board members asked for prioritization tools and next steps to refine cost estimates and potential funding strategies. The consultants and district staff said the matrix can be used to identify high-frequency needs across studies and to develop phased work plans; the board will determine whether to pursue detailed design, bond or millage options in future sessions.

Next steps: the district will use the Consolidated Priority Matrix to prioritize projects and return to the board with recommendations for sequencing and funding; no formal funding action was taken at the March 9 meeting.