Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dover board weighs ambitious 80% mastery goal and a proposal to add 'patriotism' to district vision
Summary
Board discussion of a three‑year comprehensive plan centered on an 80% mastery target for prioritized common assessments and a contentious proposal by a board member to include 'patriotism' in the vision statement; public commenters and several board members expressed divided views and asked for more time for public input before final approval.
The Dover Area School District board spent significant time on its draft comprehensive plan, which sets a district goal that 100% of students will meet an 80% mastery benchmark on prioritized common assessments over the next three years. Superintendent Doctor Mitchell and staff described the plan as a process‑driven roadmap that includes universal screeners, common assessments and quarterly progress reporting to the board.
Board discussion focused on two fault lines: the attainability and monitoring of the 80% benchmark, and a motion by Director Kendig to include the word "patriotism" in the district's vision statement. Doctor Mitchell defended the plan's process and said common assessments are intended to target essential standards and to be paired with remediation and supports: teachers would use formative data, and students not meeting the benchmark would receive targeted remediation until proficiency is achieved.
Director Kendig urged inclusion of "patriotism" to steer curriculum and to emphasize civic values in schools; other board members raised concerns that the term is broad and that the board must consider public reaction and legal context. Public commenters were split: some said patriotism is a parental or civic value that belongs in schools; others said schools should focus on civics instruction and not prescribe patriotism in the vision statement.
Board members also discussed timeline pressures: the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) deadline for the comprehensive plan was cited as March 30, and members asked whether missing that date would have definable consequences for funding or operations. The superintendent said missing the deadline would delay implementation and teacher preparation timelines but did not specify statutory penalties.
Directors agreed to give the public an opportunity to weigh in and to consider a short delay to allow a full public review before final approval at the next public meeting.
