Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves $250,000 pavement marking program after sharp debate over bike sharrows

West Des Moines City Council · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The West Des Moines City Council approved a $250,000 pavement-marking program, with roughly half budgeted for on-street bike markings (sharrows). Councilmembers debated cost, visibility, enforcement and whether signs would be more cost-effective; the resolution passed 4–1.

The City Council approved a resolution ordering construction for the 2026 pavement marking program that includes approximately $250,000 in markings; council discussion focused on allocating about half the amount (roughly $125,000) to on-street bicycle markings and the value of pavement chevrons (“sharrows”).

One council member opposing the allocation said the expense was unjustified given uncertain bike counts and budget pressures, calling the sharrows “a ridiculous amount of money” and preferring cost-effective signage. "I just can't do it," the council member said in opposition to spending for on-street bike markings.

The mayor and other supporters said the markings grew from a compromise with the Bicycle Advisory Commission after rejecting more expensive dedicated bike lanes, and that sharrows increase driver awareness where trails are not adjacent. Parks and Recreation Director Ryan Penning (first reference as Parks & Recreation Director) said sharrows and on-road markings improve visibility for drivers and can be more effective than roadside signs alone.

Councilman Trevillion (reference as a council member on the dais) highlighted that about half of the program cost is for on-street bike markings and asked staff to evaluate longer-lasting sign options. After discussion and a motion, the council voted 4 yes, 1 no to approve the pavement-marking resolution.