Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accountability Model topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff outline complexities of Indiana’s new school accountability model
Summary
Dr. Toler briefed the board on the state’s new accountability system that returns letter grades and uses individual student scores stacked with skill indicators; he emphasized iRead and attendance for early grades and explained high‑school diploma-weighted scoring.
Dr. Toler, the district’s curriculum leader, presented an overview of Indiana’s new accountability model and told trustees the system will return letter grades this year after calibration of iLearn scores.
"Every student is gonna get an individual score," Dr. Toler said, describing the model as "n equals 1". For grades 3 through 8 students receive two component scores (academic mastery from iLearn plus a menu of skill indicators) that are averaged for school scores. Toler stressed that passing iRead is critical for third graders because it materially increases a student’s point total and that attendance (94% threshold) is an important success indicator.
For grades 4–8, Toler explained stacked scoring and accelerated-growth bonuses that reward students who make more than one year of progress. For high school, academic mastery is represented by on‑track measures (for example, earning 10 credits by the end of 9th grade) and later-year scoring relies on diploma types, PSAT/SAT proficiency and graduation rate (the model weights individual student scores heavily while also counting graduation and SAT metrics).
Toler cautioned the board that the model is complex and that an initial, graduated curve will make the first-year grading scale easier until more schools meet the thresholds; the state will adjust the scale upward in stages. Board members asked for implementation details and calculation tools; Toler said the Department of Education will release a model into which the district can load its data.
Trustees generally praised the model’s broader approach compared with a test-only system while noting it increases complexity for schools and administrators.
