Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Longmont retreat spotlights council cognitive diversity, systems thinking and staff capacity
Summary
At a daylong retreat, councilors took cognitive‑style assessments and heard city managers and a facilitator urge systems thinking to avoid unintended consequences, prioritize core services and protect staff capacity for transformational projects.
Councilors at Longmont's retreat spent the morning on a facilitated "ethos" evaluation designed to surface the group's cognitive strengths and blind spots and to improve how the council and staff work together.
"My name is Barrett Abrams, and I'm the Confluence Policy and Strategy Group," the retreat facilitator, Barrett Abrams, told the council as he laid out the day's exercises. City Manager Harold led a long presentation on assessment results and their operational implications, describing how tools such as DISC and other print assessments reveal how individuals and teams perform under stress.
Harold said the assessments showed a strong "visionary/interpersonal" tendency among council members and flagged the need to ensure precision and readiness perspectives are available through staff or outside experts. "What we're looking at is how different . . . what skill sets do we bring to the table, and what does that mean for us as we're staffing projects or processing information," he said.
The retreat tied those findings to systems thinking. Harold and staff presented case studies and videos on cascading effects and urged councilors to consider how even well‑intended policies can ripple through city operations and budgets. They also stressed the practical limits of staff capacity: while transformational projects can reshape Longmont, delivering them requires protecting time and resources for core services such as public safety, utilities and maintenance.
Councilors pressed staff on practical steps to reduce risk: clearer prioritization, earlier notice about policy direction, and better cross‑departmental coordination. Harold said staff is building a more prescriptive capital‑project intake and review process to ensure proposed initiatives are assessed for system impacts and capacity before work begins.
The session concluded with a commitment from staff to synthesize retreat feedback and return proposed priority areas for council review, and with an agreement that councilors would identify a short list of underrepresented constituencies they plan to reach in ongoing community engagement work.
