Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HIB Residency Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board attorney explains HIB rules, record transfers and parental-consent limits; board warns residency reviews may lead to hearings
Summary
During public comment on Dec. 11, board attorney Adam Weiss answered detailed questions about harassment, intimidation and bullying (HIB) procedures, saying disciplinary files tied to HIB can be transferred to receiving New Jersey public schools and that parental consent is not required for school-conducted interviews; Weiss also told the board it will review residency documentation and may hold hearings if students aren’t domiciled.
At the Woodland Park Board of Education meeting on Dec. 11, board attorney Adam Weiss responded to a series of public questions about the district’s handling of harassment, intimidation and bullying investigations and addressed the board’s review of student residency documentation.
Resident Jennifer Rocco asked whether an HIB decision transfers to a student’s high-school record and how HIB counts at Memorial compare year to year. Weiss replied that the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act provides the legal framework for HIB determinations and that discipline associated with HIB incidents, where applicable, is part of a disciplinary file that a sending principal must provide to a receiving New Jersey public school within 30 days. "To the extent there was discipline associated that appears in a disciplinary file, that file will be transferred to another New Jersey Public School and to the high school," Weiss said; he added that such discipline does not appear on college transcripts.
Rocco also asked whether schools may question minors without parental consent and whether minors may sign statements without parents present. Weiss said New Jersey law and the district’s investigative practice permit school officials to interview students during an investigation without parental consent: "...the district has the ability and right... because they stand in the shoes of the parent when the parents not here." He said written statements by students are sometimes collected depending on age and cognitive ability. Weiss emphasized that special-education status or an IEP affects disciplinary decision-making insofar as the district must consider a student’s capacity to understand or be held accountable for conduct.
Weiss also noted that the district reports HIB totals to the New Jersey Department of Education and to the public twice a year and that details can be obtained from the district or the DOE website. He suggested contacting Superintendent Michele Pillari for specific year-to-year comparisons and school-level counts.
Separately, in his Board Attorney’s report Weiss said he and the administration are reviewing registration and residency documentation to confirm that students are domiciled in Woodland Park and that parents would be notified if records suggest a student is not entitled to a taxpayer-funded education in the district; he indicated residency hearings may follow when eligibility is in question.
The board did not take new policy action at the meeting on HIB practices; Weiss cited statutory definitions and investigative elements (distinguishing characteristic, substantial disruption, and whether a reasonable person would foresee harm) that determine whether an incident meets the HIB standard.
