Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reallocates CDBG recommendations to fully fund shelter shade structure, directs remainder to turf project

City Council of Tracy · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following staff recommendations for estimated CDBG/HOME awards, council voted to reallocate estimated funds so the shelter shade structure receives full requested funding ($215,763) and the remaining CDBG funds go toward the synthetic turf field ($142,757.50), subject to final HUD allocation.

City staff presented recommended award allocations for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME program based on subcommittee scoring and local priorities. Alexandra Pineda, Economic Development Analyst, explained that the staff recommendations use an adopted formula and that the estimated CDBG allocation for the city is $520,570 (subject to final county and HUD determination). She noted the public‑service cap and how awards were tiered to maximize distribution among applicants.

During public comment and council discussion, Councilmember Bedoya asked whether the council could close the shortfall on a shelter shade structure request if the council prioritized that project. Staff and the city manager explained the recommendations are preliminary and that council may reallocate among recommended projects now or wait for the county’s final allocation, but staff will continue to pursue other funding streams if full funding is not achieved.

A motion to reallocate estimated award funds to fully fund the shelter shade structure (request $215,763) and to apply remaining funds toward the synthetic turf field (resulting in $142,757.50 to that project) carried on roll call. Staff noted that these are recommendations to the county and that final awards are contingent on HUD allocations; staff will return in fall with the firm allocation and any needed adjustments.

Staff emphasized that HOME funds had no applicants in this cycle and would remain with the county until an eligible project is proposed. The council’s direction preserves flexibility for staff to pursue supplemental funding sources if necessary.