Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Las Cruces unveils new incentive packages and industrial revenue bond policy
Summary
Economic development director Elizabeth Teeters outlined programs including a $5,000 safety-improvement grant for local businesses, a proposed Metropolitan Revitalization Incentive Program offering 7–14-year property tax abatements, an IRB policy to govern future tax-exempt financing and a workforce-development inventory; council Q&A focused on eligibility and approval paths.
Elizabeth Teeters, the city’s economic development director, told the Las Cruces City Council that staff are expanding and coordinating incentive programs to help property redevelopment and support local businesses.
Teeters said the Safety Improvement Program, started in November to provide up to $5,000 per eligible business for security upgrades, was expanded July 1 into the West Picacho/Motel Boulevard MRA and had already received four applications in its first week. “Safety has come out of every MRA as a top priority,” she said.
Teeters described the proposed Metropolitan Revitalization Incentive Program (MRIP), a property-tax abatement for commercial, residential and mixed‑use development that would range from seven to 14 years depending on project qualifications. She said staff expect to bring MRIP to council for approval in August or September and that applications will be vetted by the internal MRA committee with final approval by council.
“The abatement ranges from seven to fourteen years based on the project qualifications,” Teeters said; she added the program is intended to be layered with other tools so smaller developers and local businesses can stack incentives to make projects feasible.
Teeters also said staff will present an industrial revenue bond (IRB) policy to establish application procedures, clawback provisions and fee structures for future tax-exempt financings, including qualifying multifamily housing projects. “Housing IRBs are a lot more intense than the ones we’ve used in the past, so we wanted to make sure we had a policy,” she said.
On workforce development, Teeters said staff are compiling a comprehensive inventory of at least 10 local workforce partners and plan one‑on‑one meetings to identify gaps and develop targeted programming; she noted previous ARPA-funded workforce projects and said more coordination is coming.
Councilors asked whether MRIP applies to rehabilitation as well as new construction and whether nonprofits or churches could qualify. Teeters said the program’s current framework covers commercial, residential and mixed‑use properties, and a scoring matrix and MRA committee recommendation will guide eligibility decisions.
Councilor Curran said he appreciated the update and asked whether the abatement applies to rehabilitation; Teeters confirmed rehabilitation projects are eligible. Councilor Bogota asked about nonprofit eligibility; Teeters said the scoring matrix and MRA committee discretion would determine case‑by‑case recommendations to council.
Why it matters: the proposed MRIP and IRB policy would change the city’s long‑term tax incentives and could influence private development patterns and housing finance in Las Cruces if adopted. Council will review formal ordinance or resolution language when staff return with implementation details.
Next steps: Teeters indicated MRIP and the IRB policy are planned for council consideration in late summer; staff will circulate the scoring matrix and program model details before formal action.
