Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment Block 419 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials say implementation-monitor report gives borough grounds to pursue remedies over stalled Block 419 project
Summary
A council member told the governing body that a recent implementation-monitor report to the court was unfavorable and that the borough now has legal grounds to pursue breach-of-contract remedies against the Block 419 developer, including potential court action and other remedies; officials said they may post the monitor's report if not protected.
A council member reported on March 18 that an implementation monitor assigned to the long-stalled Block 419 redevelopment delivered a report to the court last week and that its findings undermine the developer's performance.
"It's not good," the council member said, describing the implementation monitor's conclusions and saying the monitor had recommended steps to the judge. The speaker said the borough had already engaged in litigation for breach of contract and that, with the monitor's findings, officials believe they are now "on solid legal grounds" to pursue "any and all remedies" available under the redevelopment agreement.
The official reviewed the history: the agreement included an obligation to provide up to $500,000 in materials and services years ago, a sum the speaker said has eroded in value due to inflation, and the project has been effectively abandoned for about a year. The speaker said the prior administration authorized the initial deal without adequate vetting and that the redevelopment lacked a completed construction agreement.
Among remedies discussed were pursuing additional breach-of-contract claims, seeking equitable remedies from the court, and, as a last resort, taking the property back from the developer; the speaker said the borough is not in the business of doing that but left all options "on the table." The speaker added the borough would consult with counsel about whether the implementation-monitor report can be posted to the town website and said they would do so if no protective order prevents it.
Chair comments acknowledged public frustration and emphasized that current members were not responsible for prior approvals: "We're constantly getting blamed on Facebook that we're not doing anything," the chair said, noting the new council inherited the issue and is pursuing court remedies now that additional evidence is available.
Next steps described by the speaker were to coordinate with legal counsel and to file follow-up complaints as warranted; the council member said they had already begun work to put the developer on notice of imminent legal action.
Provenance: discussion and status update appear in the council meeting transcript beginning with the implementation-monitor remarks and legal update (timeline segments SEG 1948 through SEG 2073).
