Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Conveyance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves conveyance of water parcel at Lake Monomen to City of Menomonie, 4-1

Dunn County Planning, Resources and Development Committee · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dunn County's planning committee voted 4-1 to convey a county-owned water parcel (a pond at Lake Monomen) to the City of Menomonie for no purchase price; the city will pay a $30 recording fee and the county will forgo roughly $12,000 in delinquent taxes tied to the parcel.

Dunn County's Planning, Resources and Development Committee voted 4'to— on July 2 to convey a county-owned water parcel on Lake Monomen to the City of Menomonie for no purchase price, with the city responsible for a $30 recording fee.

Corporation counsel Barbara Fagan explained the parcel was taken in rem during foreclosure and described it as a water feature with islands and little development potential. "It doesn't put the parcel back on the tax roll, and it would be a conveyance for $0," counsel told the committee, adding that the county's assessment and tax history made recovering delinquent taxes impractical.

The county reported the parcel had delinquent taxes dating back to 2016; a 2021 reassessment reduced the parcel's annual tax assignment to approximately $325 from a prior amount near $825. Counsel said the county would likely be unable to recoup approximately $12,000 in outstanding taxes if it pursued auction or further collection measures.

Supervisor Morehouse moved to approve the conveyance with a $30 recording fee; Supervisor Steyer seconded. After brief discussion, the committee voted in favor by voice vote, with one member opposed.

The conveyance transfers the water parcel to the city; counsel said the transfer would not restore the parcel to the tax roll. The committee did not require any additional conditions beyond the recording-fee requirement.