Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Emissions Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves energy bill limiting certain emissions suits and authorizing court certificates; opponents warn it closes courthouse doors
Summary
House Bill 20 70 passed on final consideration after a contentious floor debate. The bill creates a process for companies to request court declarations about emissions and restricts some lawsuits over fossil-fuel carbon emissions except where federal law is violated; critics argued it could block communities from suing for local harms. Final vote: 26-5.
The Tennessee Senate voted to pass House Bill 20 70 on third and final consideration after intense floor debate over its effect on litigation and public health.
Sponsor Senator Reeves described the measure as a way to preserve the state's ability to invest in and pursue a range of energy sources. "This bill simply establishes that persons still have the right to engage in and invest in companies involved in activities related to coal, oil, and natural gas," Reeves said on the floor, adding the bill "limits the ability of governments or private entities to bring lawsuits seeking damages or other remedies related to carbon emissions from fossil fuel activities except where those activities actually do violate federal environmental laws such as the Clean Air Act."
Opponents cautioned that the bill could deny recovery to communities that say they have been harmed. Senator Campbell called the measure "a remarkable farce" if it effectively "redefine[s] pollution to 0," and Senator Lamar warned it could "shut the courthouse door" on communities seeking damages for health harms they attribute to emissions. Senator Yarbrough highlighted that the legislation creates a process for companies to seek a court declaration and noted that, as written, the bill could create an ‘‘irrebuttable presumption of 0''' emissions for companies meeting the threshold identified in the text.
Sponsor Reeves described the mechanics: companies could seek a court declaration confirming their emissions, and "if a company certifies that its emissions fall below a certain threshold based on a formula tied to the emissions from China and India, the court must presume the emissions are 0 for that period," a provision Reeves said the bill contains.
During debate senators raised concerns that the statute could be applied retroactively or extraterritorially and that it may deprive impacted communities of traditional remedies. Sponsor Reeves said the bill would rely on federal-law exceptions where applicable and defended the measure as protecting Tennessee's energy options.
The clerk recorded the final tally as 26 ayes and 5 nays and the bill was declared passed.
Ending: With passage the bill advances under the normal enrollment and transmission process; sponsors and critics signaled expectations of further debate in public and advocacy channels over the policy's practical effects and possible legal challenges.
Provenance: Debate and vote recorded on the floor (floor explanation by Senator Reeves; multiple questions and objections from Senators Yarbrough, Campbell, and Lamar).
