Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ojai council refers speed-hump policy concept to new Public Safety Commission

Ojai City Council · July 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a concept review and resident input, council voted unanimously to send the draft speed-hump policy to the newly formed Public Safety Commission for development of recommendations and prioritized review.

The Ojai City Council voted unanimously to refer a concept review of a proposed city speed-hump policy to the newly established Public Safety Commission, asking the commission to prioritize the item and return recommendations.

Staff described the item as a concept review and said the packet included a redline copy of Ventura County's policy as a starting point. Staff advised against requiring property owners to pay upfront for speed-hump installation and suggested council retain final discretion to override policy thresholds.

Council and residents discussed several technical and process questions: whether the commonly-used 67% neighborhood-support threshold should be counted by household or individual, how the threshold is gathered (door-to-door ballots, mailers, or petitions), what geographic area counts as affected properties, and whether engineering metrics such as volume and 85th-percentile speed should outweigh resident petition results.

Staff noted the budget already includes $100,000 in the capital-improvement program for speed humps next year and that installation costs range from roughly $7,000'$8,000 per hump when coordinated with paving to $10,000'$12,000 for stand-alone installs.

Public commenters urged the city to prioritize engineering studies, pre/post installation surveys, and to avoid letting adjacent-street residents veto installations on the main street. Council moved to forward the concept to the Public Safety Commission for recommendations; the motion passed unanimously.