Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Threat Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board committee reviews new threat-assessment policy required by state, seeks clearer delegation and reporting
Summary
Upper Dublin policy committee reviewed a state-mandated threat-assessment policy on June 3, pressing staff to clarify delegation of duties, notification triggers, team composition, and whether the district should report threat counts by category or risk level; the item was moved to first reading for line edits.
The Upper Dublin Policy Committee spent a substantial portion of its June 3 meeting on the district’s updated threat-assessment policy, required by Pennsylvania school code. Committee members and staff debated where to place delegation language, how notifications should be triggered and recorded, the composition and naming of the school’s safety coordinator, and what metrics the board should receive about threats.
Mr. Held said he generally supports the draft but urged clearer placement of duties and asked whether recurring language was duplicated in the policy and administrative regulations. "Under 3.1 0.1 0.4, there might be a better way to say that or a different way to say that it's a little more inclusive," he said, and proposed language changes to ensure the policy reads inclusively.
The committee asked whether the district should report not just the total number of threats but also breakdowns by category or risk level so the board can spot themes. "As we're thinking about the number of threats, I was curious, should we also be looking at ... threats by category?" Mr. Held asked. A district official said the district classifies threats by risk level (low, high) and could incorporate that terminology into the report.
Members also pressed staff on mandated-reporter obligations. One board member said noting the obligation in the threat-assessment policy should not be interpreted to replace a mandated report: "I would just add ... that there's not a misunderstanding that because the threat assessment team is addressing something that we don't have to make a mandated report," the board member said.
Staff noted the statutory language requires the district to designate a school-safety and security coordinator and to report certain information to the state school-safety and security committee. The committee voted to advance the policy for first reading while asking staff to consolidate duplicated language, consider moving definitions to a dedicated section, and add clarifying reporting language on threat counts and coordinator identification.
Next steps: Administration will prepare a revised draft that identifies who serves as the district’s school-safety coordinator, removes or reconciles duplicated language with administrative regulations, and proposes a reporting format for the board and the state.
