Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Literacy And Tutoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
University researchers tell committee high‑dosage tutoring can boost early literacy with program supports
Summary
Researchers from the University of Michigan's Youth Policy Lab briefed the committee on high‑dosage tutoring (≥3 sessions per week, consistent tutors, aligned curriculum), presenting evidence of modest early reading gains and emphasizing training, program supports and implementation costs.
Robin Jacob, co‑director of the University of Michigan Youth Policy Lab, and a colleague presented research on high‑dosage tutoring as a tool to improve early literacy. Jacob defined high‑dosage tutoring as regular sessions (at least three times per week) over an extended period, ideally with the same trained tutor and small groups, and emphasized that tutoring supplements—not replaces—high‑quality classroom instruction.
Jacob and the other presenter described program features linked to stronger outcomes: well‑trained tutors, a structured evidence‑based curriculum aligned to classroom instruction, strong attendance by students and tutors, and administrative supports. "Not all tutoring programs are equally effective," Jacob said, arguing that simply providing money for tutors is not sufficient; programs need coordination, recruitment, training and ongoing implementation support.
They cited a study of a North Carolina support model that provided implementation assistance and found reading gains equivalent to roughly 1.5 months of additional learning for kindergarten through third grade students. Presenters noted larger gains for boys in that study and said both former classroom teachers and community tutors trained by the program produced measurable benefits.
Committee members asked about different delivery models (push‑in versus pull‑out, in‑person versus virtual), culturally relevant materials, parental engagement and whether third‑grade retention is preferable to providing intensive tutoring. Presenters recommended prioritizing high‑quality tutoring over retention in many cases and described contexts where retention may be useful, such as for English language learners who need extra time to acquire language skills.
Presenters urged careful program design to achieve results and suggested the committee consider implementation supports if lawmakers fund tutoring programs.
