Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears that state preemption may block local rodenticide rules to protect bobcats
Summary
Mayor Belt told the workshop the town would like to regulate second‑generation rodenticides to protect local bobcats, but Scheidel said state preemption—express, implied/field, or conflict—could bar a municipal ordinance and recommended targeted legal review and possible AG guidance.
The Kiawah Island council discussed a current, local wildlife concern when Mayor Belt said the town would "love to be able to enact some ordinance enabled to address" bobcat harm from second‑generation rodenticides.
Eric Scheidel explained three types of state preemption that can prevent local regulation: express preemption (a statute explicitly forbids local regulation), implied or field preemption (a comprehensive regulatory scheme occupies the field), and conflict preemption (a local rule directly contradicts state law). He used firearms and DHEC regulation as examples and said the nature of the state scheme governing pesticides or public‑health matters will determine whether the town can act.
Scheidel noted Clemson University was referenced in the council's concern as the state entity with regulatory authority over rodenticides. "If the general assembly has passed a comprehensive scheme," he said, "we think they want to occupy the field," meaning municipalities will have limited room to regulate.
What the council can do now: Scheidel recommended a fact‑specific legal review of the controlling state statute and any agency rules, and, where necessary, seek an attorney general opinion about waiver or limited delegations. Council and staff also discussed non‑regulatory options such as working with property managers, education, or grants that do not impose ordinance‑style restrictions.
