Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Gifts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates strict no-gifts approach; gift policy tabled for edits
Summary
Council members debated a proposed municipal gift policy, with several urging elimination of dollar thresholds and adoption of a 'no gifts' approach; members asked staff to define 'municipal officer' and add a simple consultation path (town attorney); the resolution was tabled for revision.
Council members spent significant time Sept. 10 debating a proposed resolution to adopt a gifts policy for municipal officers and employees. The draft restricted receipt of gifts under certain enumerated circumstances; several council members urged deleting any dollar‑amount threshold and adopting a near‑blanket prohibition on gifts to simplify administration.
Council member Farrell (speaker 8) argued for an outright ban on giving or receiving gifts to avoid interpretations and record-keeping burdens: “I would probably have the view where you just make this just a no gift policy, and move from there,” he said. Council member Heidingsfelder (speaker 2) agreed and recommended regular reminders and a simple, one‑page acknowledgment for municipal officers and volunteers.
Discussion also covered whether prohibiting vendor gifts should appear in the business‑license ordinance (to enable license revocation for violations) rather than in an employees’ gift policy, and whether the policy should define municipal officers by reference to the state ethics act or by an enumerated local list.
Council directed staff to remove the dollar reference, define municipal officers (or list covered categories), add a clear consultation point (town attorney) and return a revised resolution at the October meeting; the council voted to table the resolution pending those edits.
