Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Fairgrove council approves appointments, vendor payments and returns escrowed funds
Summary
At its Aug. 5 meeting the council approved appointment of Nicole Spencer, placed Joe Pustizzi on the planning commission, approved several vendor payments and returned $38,600 in escrowed Center Street DIFS funds; multiple motions carried 3‑0‑1.
The Village of Fairgrove recorded multiple formal actions at its Aug. 5 meeting. Key votes and outcomes recorded in the minutes are listed below.
- Appointment: Motion by Harrison, second by Sebert to appoint Nicole Spencer to the Village Council; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1. Appointment to take effect at next meeting.
- Planning Commission: Motion by Sebert, second by Harrison to place Joe Pustizzi on the Planning Commission; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
- Vendor payments: Motion by Harrison, second by Sebert to pay Spicer $1,673.25, Nietzke $5,200.00 and Monchilov $3,800.00; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
- Fire Department technology: Motion by Harrison, second by Sebert to approve an $865 estimate from Gugel Tech for department technology upgrades; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
- Escrow return: Motion by Sebert, second by Harrison to return escrowed Center Street DIFS monies in the amount of $38,600.00; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
- MEC Project: Motion by Sebert, second by Harrison to table the MEC Underground Solution estimate for Circle & Park Drive (estimate $6,990); roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
- Labor Day parade: Motion by Harrison, second by Sebert to approve the Bean Festival application to hold a Labor Day parade; roll‑call vote yes—Sebert, Harrison, Young; motion carried 3‑0‑1.
The minutes record these votes as routine actions with no recorded dissents. Several other items—such as a proposed sewer fee increase and the lagoon stabilization estimate—were discussed but not acted on during the meeting.
