Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DuPage County committee approves several zoning variations; vote tallies not specified
Summary
The DuPage County Development Committee approved multiple zoning variations and recommendations, including reductions to setback requirements and driveway-side setbacks. Committee members discussed neighbor objections and site constraints; transcript does not record numeric vote tallies.
The DuPage County Development Committee approved a series of zoning recommendations and variations during its meeting. The chair moved several items, each was seconded, and the committee adopted the motions by voice vote; the transcript does not include a roll-call tally for these votes.
The actions taken included the regulatory services item “d c o 21 dash 26,” a zoning matter noted as TCO22Dash26 to reduce a corner setback from 30 feet to 17 feet for a single‑story house addition, and other cases seeking reductions to side or corner setbacks. For a driveway‑side variation listed as BC023826, officials described the change as reducing a required setback from 1.0 foot (12 inches) to 0.8 foot (9.6 inches), a difference of about 2.4 inches. Vice chair expressed that a neighbor had objected by email and asked staff whether a driveway expansion would be visually objectionable and whether there was sufficient separation from an access strip and detention pond to the south. Paul, a county staff member, confirmed there would be sufficient land between the two driveways and explained site layout constraints limited where an addition could be sited.
Another item (motion 672722) reflected a zoning hearing officer recommendation to reduce a setback for a house addition from 25 feet to roughly 10 feet; the vice chair reviewed plans and noted neighbors had been contacted prior to the petition. Each item was moved, seconded and accepted by voice vote with the chair announcing the motion carried; the transcript does not record individual vote counts or dissenting roll‑call results.
Why it matters: these approvals change permissible building envelopes in specific properties and may affect neighbor sight lines and spacing, but the committee’s decisions were framed as consistent with site constraints and prior zoning petitions. The committee did discuss neighbor concerns and whether alternatives had been explored.
What’s next: the approvals take effect per the committee’s normal procedures; the transcript contains no schedule for appeals or further hearings and does not specify any required follow‑up staff reports.
