Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Permit Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Holland Plan Commission terminates concrete contractor’s conditional-use permit for persistent debris violations
Summary
The Plan Commission voted unanimously Aug. 5 to terminate the conditional-use permit for Pushing Perfection Concrete & Construction LLC at W3070 Hoitink Road after finding the permit holder failed to comply with annual debris‑removal conditions and did not respond to repeated notices.
The Town of Holland Plan Commission voted unanimously Aug. 5 to terminate the conditional‑use permit issued to Pushing Perfection Concrete & Construction LLC, operated by Scott Soerens, after finding the company had not complied with site‑cleaning requirements.
The commission cited condition 3b of the permit, which requires that “The outdoor storage of concrete debris … shall be cleared from the Premises a minimum of one (1) time per calendar year and not less frequently than every fifteen (15) months.” Officials said the concrete debris pile had not been cleared since the permit was issued on March 7, 2022, and that an on‑site inspection on Feb. 26, 2024 produced photographs documenting the condition. The town reported no response to written notices dated May 19, 2023; Aug. 29, 2023; Jan. 9, 2024; and May 15, 2024.
Jack Stokdyk moved to terminate the permit; David Mueller seconded. The motion carried by unanimous roll-call vote. Chair David Huenink presided over the hearing and vote.
The commission’s action takes effect immediately. Meeting minutes show the termination was recommended after staff and commissioners concluded that the permit holder had not taken corrective action or engaged with the town to address the violations. The commission did not record a remedial timeline attached to the termination; the minutes state the permit holder had been contacted in writing and inspected prior to the vote.
Next steps for the property owner were not specified in the minutes; the town may follow up with code‑enforcement procedures consistent with local ordinance procedures and the terminated CUP record.
