Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pre Application topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission offers feedback on pre‑applications: decks, screening and pool/HVAC enclosures
Summary
At its July 7 meeting the commission reviewed pre‑applications for a deck on Ashby Street, screening for mechanical equipment at a Crowley residence, and follow‑up fencing and screening for a previously approved shed; commissioners asked for clearer dimensions, head‑clearance details and vendor/airflow confirmation for screening in the floodplain.
During the pre‑application portion of the July 7 meeting the commission accepted several informal reviews and additions to the agenda. James and Ali Dunnigan sought feedback on replacing and extending a rear deck; commissioners recommended the applicants consult their architect about head‑clearance at stairs (80 inches standard), provide detailed riser/stair geometry and submit images of preferred baluster/railing materials. The commission noted the deck will be visible from Ashby/Latham and asked for proposed materials and any screening details.
Architect Peter Springfield presented options to screen pool equipment and an elevated split system at 2 Eldridge Street. Because some equipment must sit elevated for floodplain reasons, Springfield proposed a heavy‑gauge cedar lattice stained in a rectilinear pattern. Commissioners suggested a removable end panel to screen the compressor from river views without blocking ventilation and asked the applicant to confirm vendor approvals and airflow clearances before a formal submission.
Under old business Chris Wilson described a previously approved screening plan and proposed adding fence elements; commissioners advised filing a new application and reminded applicants that fence height and grading can affect approved screening limits. Staff reiterated that applicants should file complete applications and that staff can assist with submittal at the counter.
No formal approvals were taken during pre‑applications; the commission directed applicants to return with architect‑level drawings, annotated elevations, and technical specifications for screening and decking materials.
