Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident accuses assessment disparities; commissioners explain assessment process and note reassessment concerns
Summary
During public comment, resident Harry Stauffer alleged that county property assessments are far below market sale prices and urged an investigation and reassessment; county officials explained that taxes are based on assessed value using comparables, not sale price, and that the county's last reassessment was in 1994 with a declining common level ratio.
Harry Stauffer used the public-comment period to press county leaders on what he described as widespread disparities between sale prices and assessed values, offering multiple property examples and urging the county to investigate and to align assessments with market values.
Stauffer listed several parcels he said were sold for substantially more than their assessed values and claimed the county was "losing" tax revenue as a result. He described one property (paid for at $192,000) with an assessed value he said was $42,000 and urged a restructuring of the tax system and a reassessment of properties. "They're assessed at $45,000," Stauffer said of a parcel he described; "You're losing $91,000 in taxes," he asserted about another example.
County officials responded during and after Stauffer's remarks. Chair Leinbach and Commissioner Rivera explained that property taxes are calculated on the basis of assessed value and not simply the sale price; assessors use comparable properties to set assessed values and taxpayers may appeal assessments using appraisals. Leinbach acknowledged a disparity and noted that the county's last full reassessment was in 1994; he said the common level ratio (the statistic that helps equalize assessments to market value) has declined to the mid-30s, which limits the ratio's effectiveness in mitigating long-running differences between assessed and market values.
Leinbach emphasized the county follows set procedures: appeals and the use of appraisals and comparable sales are the standard means to challenge assessments rather than basing taxes strictly on sale price. The transcript shows no immediate policy vote or directive to launch a countywide reassessment; Stauffer urged an investigation, and county officials cited process and the need for formal reassessment activities to address long-term disparities.
What happens next: the public-comment exchange raised the issue publicly; a full reassessment or formal investigation was not recorded in the meeting excerpt and would require additional administrative or policy action by the board and assessors.
