Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget And Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission discusses FY26/27 budget input and preservation-inventory cleanup

Redondo Beach Public Amenities Commission · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission discussed a template for submitting budget "wish lists" to the city manager, agreed the budget subcommittee would aggregate recommendations for FY26/27, and debated proposals to notify property owners and pare down the historic-resource inventory ahead of an ordinance rewrite.

Commissioners spent a substantial portion of the March 11 meeting shaping how the Public Amenities Commission will provide input on the fiscal-year 2026-27 budget and the city's upcoming strategic-plan session.

Staff asked commissioners to coalesce around a set of recommendations and suggested funneling individual "wish lists" through the commission's subcommittee for an aggregated submission to the city manager. Committee member (voice 5) recommended using a template that separates items proposed for the next budget cycle from longer-term strategic priorities, and commissioners generally agreed that an organized, recurring process would reduce last-minute requests.

The meeting also featured an extended debate about the city's historic-resource inventory and a possible ordinance rewrite. Chair Morocco said the city has "probably 1,500 properties" listed and proposed a process to notify property owners and "call down" C- and D-rated properties to reduce the inventory size. Commissioners discussed that a new ordinance is planned but not yet drafted; Chair Morocco warned a wholesale re-write would not eliminate the state's five-year survey requirement and could create additional work for staff.

Commissioner (voice 3) and others favored a phased approach that starts with owner notification and opt-out/appeal processes rather than an immediate citywide resurvey. Commissioners agreed to agendize preservation-subcommittee work and to receive and file the strategic-plan discussion for further action.