Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cluster Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board questions density bonuses, urges refinement to cluster development draft
Summary
Members expressed concern that proposed density bonuses (up to 175%) could produce suburban patterns, questioned whether bonuses would yield affordable housing, and discussed limiting cluster provisions to village overlay districts; staff will refine the draft and map overlay options.
Town Planner Charles Wise presented revised cluster development materials at the April 8 meeting, including sketch-plan review tools and hypothetical examples prepared by a surveyor team. The draft proposes density bonuses that could increase allowable development intensity to as much as 175% of base density, with Board authority to reduce bonuses for larger parcels (150% for 10—0-20 acres; 125% for parcels over 20 acres).
Board members raised multiple concerns. Member John Annaian questioned whether the density bonuses would produce genuinely affordable housing, suggesting developers might reduce market price modestly (he cited an illustrative change from $800,000 to $700,000) rather than creating units affordable to local households. Brendan Connolly warned that extreme bonuses applied town-wide risked creating suburban development patterns inconsistent with Moultonborough's rural character and suggested testing bonuses within existing Village and West Village overlay districts first.
Infrastructure and maintenance of private roads were highlighted as a potential long-term cost if developers build low-standard private streets that later petition the town for acceptance. Members noted that several local cluster-style subdivisions (Windward Harbor, Harbor Pines, Harbor Side) demonstrate successful examples, but the board saw a need for clearer design standards and geographic limits.
Planner Clayton Titus offered to prepare blank maps for board members to mark preferred overlay boundaries; staff will overlay responses to identify areas of consensus. The Conservation Commission has scheduled a joint work session with the Planning Board for Sept. 30, 2026, to review ordinances from a conservation perspective.
The Board reached consensus that the cluster ordinance requires additional refinement and that options to limit bonuses to overlay districts or otherwise narrow geographic scope should be pursued before advancing a town-wide approach.
