Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Abatement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews proposed CRA agreement for Ares Sportswear, defers action

Marion City Council (committee meetings) · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Regional planning presented a proposed CRA agreement for Ares Sportswear to relocate to 645 Bellefontaine Ave. The company seeks to relocate and expand jobs; the draft calls for a 75% abatement over 12 years (owner asked for 100%). Staff recommended deferring formal action until a 30‑day notice period elapses to allow any affected jurisdictions to respond.

Regional planning asked the Jobs & Economic Development Committee to review a proposed Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) agreement with Ares Sportswear, a relocation that staff said would bring 18 full‑time and 20 part‑time employees from Hilliard and add further hires to reach a projected total by 2028.

Ken Legeza of regional planning said the company earlier requested a 100% abatement for 12 years but the draft before the committee applies a 75% abatement on the building improvements. "He had asked for a 100% for 12 years," Legeza said; "he had no problem" with the adjusted 75% structure after conversation with staff.

Councilman Barr flagged a template issue in the draft that referenced Fastenal and noted prior CRA contracts had clawback provisions requiring repayment if firms left early. Legeza confirmed the draft will include a clawback provision and recommended waiting until at least Aug. 3 — a 30‑day window after notice was sent to the other jurisdiction — before formal council action so Hilliard or other bodies could raise objections.

Committee members asked staff for a fiscal impact analysis showing city revenue foregone under the abatement and projected income‑tax revenue from new jobs; staff agreed to provide those figures. No final action was taken; the proposal will return to committee after staff provides revised documents and the statutory notice period passes.