Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning R2 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners amend rezoning to R-2 after extended public comment on drainage and lot sizes

St. Tammany Parish Planning Commission · July 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After prolonged public comment about drainage, road safety and potential for one-acre lots, the commission amended a petitioner’s rezoning request to R-2 (3-acre minimum) and approved the amended request for a 14.82-acre property in the Covington area.

A request to rezone a roughly 14.82-acre property near Jim Sharp Road drew extended public comment and commissioner scrutiny before the Planning Commission approved an amended zoning designation to R-2 (3-acre minimum) rather than the petitioner’s original request that would allow 1-acre lots.

Neighbors testified at length about drainage and safety concerns, and several speakers urged commissioners to deny the original request. Brian Sharp and Jim Sharp described the site’s drainage bowl topography and existing pipeline crossings and said dividing the property into one-acre parcels would dramatically change the area’s rural character. Jim Sharp showed plan diagrams and urged commissioners that the land was "not dividable."

Commissioners discussed alternatives including denying the request, postponing to gather additional survey and variance information, or amending the petition to R-2. Staff explained that, depending on precise lot areas and potential variances, the planning commission has limited authority to grant up to a 10% reduction from minimum lot area in some circumstances.

The petitioner said he was willing to accept an R-2 amendment to address neighbors' concerns. Following the discussion Commissioner Robert moved to approve the amended request to R-2 zoning; Commissioners seconded and the motion carried.

What was at stake: opponents warned that rezoning to smaller lots could create as many as 15 house sites and exacerbate drainage problems and road-safety risks on local roads; proponents said the owner and an interested buyer hope to split the property into larger 2.9–3-acre parcels to make housing more affordable for family members.

Outcome: The commission approved the amended R-2 rezoning; staff and the petitioner were instructed to coordinate on final lot lines and minor-subdivision steps that will follow the zoning decision.