Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Pud Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission asks staff to redline PUD code after finding conflict with DRC language
Summary
Commissioners were briefed on contradictions in Tremonton's PUD/PED code and asked staff to circulate redline language clarifying that PUD overlays are legislative actions, while development agreements — not PUD approvals — contain infrastructure commitments.
Tremonton ' The Planning Commission spent the bulk of its meeting on proposed changes to the city's planned unit development (PUD) overlay and related PED code, directing staff to prepare redline edits for the commission to review.
Staff member (speaker 3) told commissioners the PUD overlay language at the start of the code treats PUDs as a legislative action requiring public hearing and council approval, but a later section (1.33.040) reads like an administrative Development Review Committee (DRC) approval process, creating a contradiction. "It still has to go through the legislative process," the staff member said, noting that state code and the city's earlier chapters support treating the overlay as legislative.
The presentation reviewed practical consequences: a PUD overlay allows the city to require architectural standards and amenities that typical zoning cannot, and a bonus-density calculator shows how points for design and open space convert into added units. The staff demonstration showed required open space at 15% as the baseline and explained how points convert to a percentage bonus; in the example packet the generated bonus was about 37.5 percent.
Commissioners debated sequencing: several said a DRC concept meeting before the legislative hearing could surface major engineering hurdles (water lines, fire egress, road upgrades) so developers would not expend substantial private funds before the city identifies major obstacles. Staff and the commission clarified that infrastructure commitments must be secured in a development agreement, not by the PUD overlay alone. "That's where the teeth are," one commissioner said.
The commission asked staff to draft and circulate a redline version of the proposed code changes and to include a staff report summarizing DRC findings for future PUD concept submittals. Staff agreed to produce the redline and circulate it for review before the next meeting. The item will return to the commission after staff revision and public notice.
