Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Edmore approves Category B grant resolution for Quicksilver Lane repaving project
Summary
The council approved Resolution No. 25‑0609 to apply for a $50,600 Category B grant to remove and replace 1.5–2 inches of asphalt on Quicksilver Lane (30‑foot width); the grant would cover up to 50% of eligible costs and would require a 50% local match if awarded.
The Village of Edmore Council approved Resolution No. 25‑0609 on June 9 to apply for a Category B street improvement grant (Community Service Infrastructure Fund/TEDF Category B) for a pavement project on Quicksilver Lane.
Manager Mark Borden described the proposed work as removing a 1.5–2‑inch layer of existing asphalt and replacing it with new pavement 30 feet wide. Quicksilver Lane is listed as a Local Street on the village ACT 51 map, and the Category B program target communities like Edmore; the grant can fund up to 50% of eligible costs with a maximum award of $250,000, meaning the village would provide a 50% match if the application is successful. The project timing, if funded, would be during the 2026–2027 fiscal year.
Trustee Colburn moved to approve Resolution No. 25‑0609 for a $50,600 Category B grant application; Trustee McParland supported the motion. The roll call vote was unanimous (Colburn, Griswold, Kanine, McParland, Moore, Pierce, Guild). Borden said staff will proceed with the application process and return to council with updates if the village is awarded funding.
Next steps: submit the Category B application and, if awarded, secure the required local match and schedule the project in the 2026–2027 budget cycle.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
