Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves TIF request for 120‑unit Sterling Apartments phase; developers say project needs subsidy to be viable
Summary
Council approved a resolution sending a $20.5 million Sterling Apartments redevelopment plan (120 units) back to the CRA with a $4 million TIF request. Developers said private financing hinges on the TIF award; residents raised concerns about public subsidy and school impacts.
The Grand Island City Council approved a tax‑increment financing request and redevelopment plan for the final phase of the Sterling Apartments on March 24, advancing a roughly $20.5 million, 120‑unit proposal that asks for about $4 million in TIF over 15 years.
Planning director Chad Nabody said the site is planned for higher‑density residential use under the amended future land‑use map. Developer representatives Zach Butts and Bruce Shriner told council the project meets statutory requirements for workforce housing (costs per unit roughly $171,000, under a $250,000/unit workforce cap) and that private financing is contingent on TIF support.
Why it matters: Developers said the TIF is necessary to make bank financing available and to keep rents affordable in the project. Opponents and at least one public commenter argued that TIFs are public subsidies that reduce school funding per student and asked the council to reassess the city's TIF policy and reporting cadence.
What was presented: The developers described high demand in the Sterling area and near‑full occupancy at existing units, provided assessed‑value draft numbers, and described a capital stack that requires the TIF portion for bank participation. Planning and CRA recommended approval; council voted to adopt the resolution sending the plan forward for contract and CRA action.
Council direction: The council approved the resolution and asked staff to ensure CRA contract terms and workforce housing eligibility are documented. Several council members asked for improved reporting on TIF exposures and a more frequent TIF status report to the council and public.
