Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments And Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cedar Grove council approves slate of board and liaison appointments in reorganization meeting

Township Council of Cedar Grove · July 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the July 1 reorganization meeting the council approved a consent agenda of appointments and liaisons to planning, historical, health, library, CATV, recreation, education and other boards; each item was moved, seconded and approved by roll call.

The Cedar Grove Township Council approved a lengthy consent agenda of appointments and council liaison assignments during its July 1, 2024, reorganization meeting. The items were considered individually as required and approved by roll call votes.

Items on the consent agenda (listed by the order read at the meeting) included: appointments to the planning board (class 1, class 3 and council liaison positions); a council liaison to the historical society; a liaison to the health advisory council; a member appointment to the Alliance for Substance Abuse Prevention Committee; appointments to the library board of trustees; council liaison to the CATV committee; recreation advisory board liaison; council liaisons to the Board of Education; appointments to the Emergency Management Council; members to the rent-leveling board; a council liaison to the Verona Cedar Grove Flood Advisory Control Board; liaison to the Cedar Ridge Senior Citizens Building; and members to the zoning board of adjustment.

Each item was moved and seconded on the record. The roll calls for those items were recorded as affirmative by the clerk in each instance. The transcript shows consistent "Yes" responses from the council during those votes; no "No" or abstention votes were recorded in the portion of the transcript covering the consent agenda.

Because the appointments were taken under the consent agenda with no substantive debate recorded, the council treated each as a procedural matter and advanced each appointment to approval by roll call. The meeting then opened for public comment (no speakers) and adjourned.