Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission tables three school renovation plans after detailed debate on trees, stormwater and circulation
Summary
Planning staff and applicants presented combined lot consolidations and land‑development plans for Peebles, Hozak and Ingemar elementary schools; commissioners pressed on tree removal counts (74 at Peebles; 104 at Hozak noted), stormwater infiltration, sidewalk connections, and parent/bus queuing. Each application was tabled for revisions.
Craig Bishop of HRG presented combined lot‑consolidation and land‑development plans for three North Allegheny School District properties (Peebles, Hozak and Ingemar). Each presentation described building additions (administrative and LGI rooms), revised entrance/exit geometry to separate bus and parent flows, additional on‑site parking and revised playground arrangements. The applicants said they submitted stormwater test results; some sites showed infiltration potential while others required managed‑release underground detention.
Commissioners and district staff pressed detailed questions on several recurring issues. Tree removal was a focal point: the Peebles submission identified roughly 74 trees over 6 inches in diameter to be removed and the Hozak project listed about 104 trees to be removed (the applicant noted replacement planting obligations could exceed on‑site capacity and discussed payment‑in‑lieu or off‑site planting under a future development agreement). Stormwater testing drove design choices: where infiltration was possible, applicants concentrated detention in a specific area that often conflicted with large stands of vegetation; where infiltration failed, underground detention and managed release were proposed.
Pedestrian safety and circulation were repeatedly raised. Commissioners debated whether to extend short existing sidewalks to Peoples Road: some argued extension would improve connections if the township plans a future sidewalk, while others said extending a sidewalk with no safe continuous route could encourage risky walking across busy stretches. The district’s director of facilities said the projects do not increase student counts but aim to improve operational circulation and safety; staff and commissioners nonetheless requested clearer documentation of bus turning radii, sight‑distance analyses and parking assignments (staff vs. visitors) to ensure the proposed circulation would function at peak drop‑off and dismissal times.
Given outstanding technical and landscaping concerns—tree replacement shortfalls, slope/waiver justification, sidewalk and PennDOT coordination, and clarification of stormwater detention locations—the commission moved and tabled each of the school projects to allow the applicants to return with revised plans and the requested documentation.
