Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accommodation Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves state accommodation tax spending plan amid debate over public benefit and resort applications
Summary
After a contentious Ways & Means review and an advisory committee process, council approved a recommendation for distribution of state accommodation tax dollars, prioritizing statutory set‑asides, town uses (including civic and cultural center funding), and a limited applicant pool; several councilors expressed concern about private benefit, conflicts of interest, and the resort withdrew its application during deliberations.
Get email alerts on the Accommodation Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town Council approved on June 2 a Ways & Means recommendation allocating the town’s state accommodations tax receipts, directing 30% to the Charleston Visitors Bureau as required, setting the statutory general fund transfer and earmarking funds for town uses including the Civic & Cultural Center, beach patrol, and deputies, and reserving a pool for external applicants.
The process produced sharp debate. Advisory committee deliberations and Ways & Means reviews examined whether particular applications primarily advance a public purpose — a constitutional requirement under state law — or principally benefit private entities. Roger (speaker 19), speaking for resort operations and island programming, withdrew the resort’s application during the advisory process, saying he preferred to preserve process integrity and pursue other partnership arrangements with the town.
Council members expressed divided views. Supporters said the proposed allocations conform to law and prioritize town uses that tangibly benefit visitors and residents. Dissenting members noted the advisory committee’s detailed vote tallies and objected to some outside allocations while reporting an abstention during the council vote. The council approved the Ways & Means recommended allocation and directed staff to conduct a second application round, refine criteria around public benefit and conflicts of interest, and explore public‑private partnership frameworks for larger island events.
What to expect: The town will open a second funding round later in the year and work with counsel to tighten guidance for advisory committee members to avoid conflicts and better document public benefit for applicant projects.

