Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Franklin deer‑management committee presents options; council weighs regional coordination with USDA-led culls
Summary
A citizen committee delivered a fact‑based report outlining conflict‑mitigation, nonlethal reproductive options and lethal removal methods; the council and residents discussed data gaps, DNR logistics (a 5‑acre requirement for culls) and possible participation in a Southeast Michigan coalition that used USDA sharpshooters.
The Franklin Village Deer Management Research Committee presented its final report at the May 11 council meeting, outlining a range of options to reduce human–deer conflicts, from landscaping and fencing changes to non‑lethal reproductive interventions and, where necessary under Michigan law, lethal removal methods.
Blaine Dennis, chair of the committee, told the council the group aimed to be "fact based and objective" and emphasized that Franklin lacks Franklin‑specific deer‑population data. The committee organized options into conflict‑mitigation measures (ordinance changes, resident education, targeted fencing), non‑lethal methods that affect reproduction and lethal methods such as organized calls (culls). Dennis noted that other municipalities (Southfield, Farmington Hills, Farmington) have more resources and larger land area and that logistics for lethal methods in Michigan typically require contiguous parcels of at least five acres, which can limit feasibility in a small village.
Margaret Bancroft and other residents urged regional coordination. Bancroft highlighted a regional effort in January in which about 70 deer were removed and said combining property and resources is necessary for effectiveness. Dennis and the chair described the Southeast Michigan Urban Deer Coalition and said the coalition has worked with the U.S. Department of Agriculture; the USDA has led recent calls but availability of sharpshooters and weather can limit results. The committee and council also discussed a USDA proposal described during the meeting that would have communities jointly fund an assigned USDA biologist (the estimate discussed in the meeting was roughly $150,000–$180,000 per year for an individual biologist to serve participating communities) and that Southfield had recently committed significant funds for culling operations.
Councilors and residents pressed for more local data before committing to long‑term measures. The committee recommended further public information sessions, better incident reporting (so deer‑related complaints are tracked consistently), and transparent public engagement if the village considers joining a regional cull or adopting ordinance changes. The chair said he would gather more information at a Thursday coalition meeting and report back.
The council did not vote on any measure at the meeting; members discussed next steps including community outreach, cost and timing considerations, and reviewing the village fencing ordinance as a near‑term mitigation tool.
