Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays decision on curb cut at 3413 39th Avenue amid permit and retaining‑wall questions
Summary
A resident’s request to cut the curb and install a driveway at 3413 39th Avenue was tabled after staff and council flagged discrepancies in the application, possible need for a retaining wall and requirement for a returnable bond; the council asked the resident to present complete plans and permits at the next work session.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilors paused action on a resident’s request to create a curb cut and driveway at 3413 39th Avenue after staff and members raised several permitting and safety concerns.
Town staff (speaker 11) said the record and the submitted materials contained conflicting information: the permit application described an "existing gravel driveway" although aerial and recent observations indicated there had been a brick wall and exposed dirt until recently. Council members flagged a discrepancy in the survey dimensions cited on the application, questioned whether a retaining wall (triggered when slope change exceeds two feet) would be required, and reminded the room that curb cuts affect the town right‑of‑way.
Council discussed administrative options—delegating routine apron/driveway approvals to code enforcement versus keeping curb‑cut approvals under council purview—and the need for a returnable bond to ensure work in the right‑of‑way is completed to town standards. Several council members recommended the owner coordinate county inspections and submit necessary retaining‑wall and apron permits. Given those outstanding items, a council member moved and the body voted to table the curb‑cut request and asked the resident to appear at the next work session with complete documentation, permits and a plan for any required retaining wall.
Why it matters: curb cuts permanently alter the public curb and sidewalk and can create long‑term maintenance obligations for the town; ensuring accurate surveys, proper permits and financial surety prevents the town from inheriting incomplete or unsafe work.
Next steps: the council asked staff to request the resident provide complete plans, county inspections/permits if required, and an appropriate returnable bond; the matter will return for council consideration at the next work session.

