Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Spending Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Committee on Natural Resources opening speaker criticizes federal spending, cites alleged fraud
Summary
The meeting opened with the committee's presiding speaker sharply criticizing federal spending under Democratic leadership, naming several specific dollar amounts and an alleged nonprofit theft as examples of waste, fraud and abuse. No formal votes or rebuttals were recorded during the remarks.
The chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources opened the meeting by sharply criticizing federal spending under Democratic leadership and citing a series of alleged examples of waste, fraud and abuse.
He accused Democrats of a "crazy spending spree" and said, "$22,000,000,000 from Biden's HHS to provide free housing and cars for illegals," arguing those funds would be better spent on unmet needs such as housing for homeless veterans. He also said "$45,000,000 for DEI scholarships in Burma" and cited "$40,000,000 to improve the social and economic inclusion of migrants" as other examples of spending he viewed as misplaced. The speaker repeated a claim that the administration spent "$20,000,000 for Sesame Street in The Middle East."
On a particularly emphatic note, the chair said, "8,000,000 to make mice transgender," using the example to criticize research and program priorities and to urge tighter oversight of federal grants and contracts. Throughout the remarks he framed these items as factual allocations and contrasted them with local needs.
The speaker also invoked an alleged fraud case: he said Amy Bach, described as the executive and co-founder of the Minnesota nonprofit Feeding Our Future, and her network "stole $250,000,000 intended to feed hungry children," calling the conduct theft rather than a paperwork error. He characterized such cases as evidence that stronger oversight and prosecution are needed for those who misuse taxpayer dollars.
The remarks were framed as part of a broader argument that federal agencies have operated with "weak oversight, loose control, and almost no accountability," and that Republicans in the House have been pursuing measures to curb waste, fraud and abuse. He repeatedly contrasted that approach with what he described as Democratic opposition to such oversight measures.
The meeting record contains these statements as assertions by the opening speaker; the transcript does not record any immediate rebuttal, independent verification, or a formal vote connected to the claims made. The remainder of the session continued with no recorded formal action tied to the allegations.
