Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Partnerships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Myers advisory board weighs external partnerships for environmental recognition, tables decision to next meeting
Summary
Board members discussed partnering with local environmental groups (Sierra Club’s Calusa group, Healthy Earth and others) to run a stewardship recognition program but legal counsel recommended case‑by‑case review; a motion to delegate a draft outline received no second and the item was carried to the next meeting.
During the same meeting, the board considered follow‑up on outreach to local organizations to support a proposed environmental stewardship recognition program.
Board member Bennett Martin reported conversations with regional groups, including the Sierra Club (Calusa Group), North Fort Myers Conservancy and a grassroots group called Healthy Earth, noting interest from the Sierra Club in partnering and promoting a State of the Water summit where the city could appear as a sponsor.
Legal counsel cautioned that whether a formal partnership is permissible depends on the specifics of the proposed collaboration. Counsel said some partnerships are routine (presentations and public collaboration) but others could require city council approval, implicate the Sunshine Law or trigger DEI‑related restrictions depending on contracting or funding arrangements. "It would be case specific," counsel said, recommending staff and legal review when a specific partner and role are identified.
Board members discussed options including keeping the recognition program city‑run to avoid complex oversight, asking councilmembers to nominate households or businesses by ward, or drafting clear criteria and scope to present at a future meeting. Chair Hempelman moved that Member Bennett Martin draft an outline for the next meeting, but the motion received no second and did not advance; the board instead agreed to carry the item to the next meeting with a clearer agenda and suggested that members bring proposed criteria or candidate nominees.
The board closed the item with direction to continue outreach and to place the partnership/award criteria on the August 4 agenda for further public discussion and possible legal review.
