Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ev Charging topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews HB24-1173-driven EV charging code updates and Brighton's planned EV rebate program

Brighton Sustainability Advisory Board · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Brighton's Sustainability Advisory Board reviewed proposed land use code updates required under House Bill 24-1173, including permitting streamlining and standards for Level 1/2/DC fast chargers, and heard that Brighton plans an EV rebate program funded by a Colorado Energy Office grant; members highlighted multifamily charging access and charging deserts.

At the May 14 meeting, staff member Traci McLean outlined proposed land use code updates the city must consider under House Bill 24-1173, which would require municipalities to adopt a model EV charging code, adopt equivalent standards, or formally opt out. McLean said the updates would standardize definitions and permitting for Level 1, Level 2 and DC fast charging, and would address siting, lighting, parking and accessibility requirements to coordinate with state ADA standards.

McLean also told the board Brighton plans an EV rebate program funded through a Colorado Energy Office grant, and said the proposed incentives would include rebates for electric vehicles and e-bikes as federal incentives have waned. Board members raised concerns about equitable access, particularly for multifamily housing, compatibility of charging connectors between systems, and "charging deserts" where public charging is scarce.

Discussion included opportunities to streamline permitting and reduce administrative barriers to make charger installation more predictable for developers and property owners. Members emphasized the need for resident education about EV ownership, and noted ongoing considerations about maintenance costs and long-term charger compatibility.

No formal action was taken; the item was placed on future agendas as staff continues to refine code language and coordinate with City Council and grant program requirements.