Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenters urge county to regulate kratom rather than ban it and to restore physical jail mail

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors · May 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dozens of residents told the board during public comment to remove a proposed kratom ban from the consent agenda and to distinguish natural kratom from dangerous synthetic derivatives; many also urged the county to cancel the out‑of‑state jail‑mail scanning contract and restore physical mail for incarcerated people.

A sustained public comment period drew dozens of speakers on two flashpoint topics: a proposed county ordinance that would ban kratom products and a county contract that routes incoming jail mail to an out‑of‑state scanner rather than delivering physical mail to residents in custody.

Multiple speakers who identified themselves as chronic‑pain patients, veterans, harm‑reduction advocates and business owners urged the board to remove the kratom item from the consent calendar and to write regulation that targets concentrated synthetic compounds rather than criminalizing natural leaf kratom. "Banning it won't stop demand — it will only push people back towards dangerous drugs," said a commenter who identified himself as Adam, who said kratom helped him recover from opioid addiction.

Others testified to the risks they associate with kratom. Susan Eppard said her son died in 2021 and described autopsy results that she said showed metragynine toxicity; Dan Gibbs said his son died after ingesting retail kratom and urged action to protect residents. Speakers asked the board to rely on current FDA, CDC, and state guidance and to coordinate with pending state legislation that would regulate rather than ban natural kratom products.

A second cluster of public comments focused on jail mail: families, clergy and advocates called on the county to terminate its contract with an out‑of‑state scanning vendor that requires families to send mail to Florida for scanning and display on shared tablets — a change that commenters said disrupts rehabilitation and core family connections. "They can't hold up a birthday card or a family photo — it's crazy," said Nancy Goodman. Several speakers noted an ongoing lawsuit and urged the county to restore physical mail.

Board members heard the comments and, after the public comment period, approved the consent agenda that included the disputed item; several supervisors later acknowledged the volume of testimony and asked staff to ensure proper follow up and engagement on these matters.