Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Power topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth committee presses for clearer Community Power messaging, debates refresh thresholds
Summary
Committee reviewed a draft press release about Portsmouth Community Power rates and debated whether to seek monthly refreshes or set a local threshold to hold back automatic enrollments; members prioritized better CPCNH customer communications over applying a local carve‑out.
The Fort Smith Energy Advisory Committee spent much of the meeting reviewing a draft press release and discussing the city’s role in communications and refresh policy for Portsmouth Community Power (CPCNH). Members urged clearer notices to residents about how refreshes work, recommended removing language that could be read as steering low‑income residents, and debated whether the city should ask CPCNH to perform monthly rolling refreshes or seek the authority to hold back enrollments when the rate delta to the incumbent utility is large.
Why it matters: Recent automatic 'refresh' enrollments brought a large group of new customers into CPCNH with limited advance notice and caused community concern. Committee members said the committee's priority is ensuring residents receive clear, timely rate comparisons and explicit opt‑out instructions before any refresh is executed.
Members reviewed draft press language and suggested edits to avoid implying that affordability alone should drive switching choices. One member recommended removing phrasing that could suggest low‑income residents should remain with the incumbent utility; others said the release should emphasize choice and how to opt out. “We just remind customers that they have the right to switch to any utility they want and switch back to us at any time,” a committee member said during the discussion.
On the refresh cadence, opinions varied. Some members supported an automatic monthly sweep (which would reduce large one‑time bulk enrollments) while others noted CPCNH’s board has set a refresh protocol and that the member towns can request exceptions. The committee did not adopt a local carve‑out policy at the meeting; instead the chair said he will report the committee’s communication‑first preference to council and ask CPCNH to clarify their refresh schedule and notification detail.
The committee also flagged potential advocacy at state and federal levels — including asking representatives about the Investment Tax Credit — as part of broader efforts to protect project economics and consumer outcomes.
Next steps: Chair will report committee feedback to council and request CPCNH documentation about its refresh cadence and customer notifications; staff will incorporate suggested edits to the draft press release and monitor CPCNH communications.
