Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Variance 2025 12 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Silver Spring zoning board unanimously approves variance for Enola homeowners to add basketball court

Silver Spring Township Zoning Hearing Board · July 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Silver Spring Township Zoning Hearing Board on Aug. 11 unanimously approved Variance 2025-12 allowing Nazanin and David Silver to add a basketball court at 24 Sagecrest Circle, finding required notices were posted and noting letters of support from abutting property owners.

On Aug. 11, 2025, the Silver Spring Township Zoning Hearing Board unanimously approved Variance 2025-12, allowing Nazanin and David Silver to construct a basketball court at their Enola property, 24 Sagecrest Circle. The variance modifies the impervious coverage limits set in Section 202.C of the Silver Spring Township Zoning Ordinance for the Residential (R-1) district.

Zoning Hearing Officer Chelsea Leiby told the board that the required legal notices were published or posted as required by law. Applicant David Silver and his representative, Justin Kuhn, presented testimony and evidence noting that the property’s current impervious coverage is conforming and below 10 percent and that abutting property owners submitted letters of support for the request.

Vice-Chairman Richard Maffett opened the floor for public comment and no members of the public spoke on the application. The board recessed to an executive session for quasi-judicial deliberations and returned to vote. Board Member Ryan Siney moved to approve the variance; Board Member James Hall seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Chairman Donald Franklin was absent from the meeting.

The approval authorizes the applicants to proceed with the proposed site work consistent with the variance as approved; the record does not specify permit or construction timelines. The meeting adjourned at 6:31 P.M.