Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hanover Township School District launches community strategic-planning process and seeks core planning team
Summary
District staff and consultants from TMI Education launched a community strategic-planning process, opened a community values survey and asked PTA presidents to nominate a 25–35 person core planning team to begin work in November.
Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hanover Township School District opened a community strategic-planning workshop Monday night as consultants from TMI Education outlined a four‑phase process and asked residents, staff and parents to help shape the district’s long-range goals.
"We are the Hanover Township Public Schools," the district representative told attendees as the session began and introduced the facilitators from TMI Education. Rich Panacucci, CEO of TMI Education, said the process will move from community values to mission and vision statements, through a gap analysis of district data, and into detailed action plans.
Panacucci described three tiers of input: a community values survey already launched, focused stakeholder sessions and a 25–35 member core planning team that will draft the plan. "The survey is already out there," he said, and participants were given a QR code to complete it that evening.
District staff outlined how core-team members will be chosen: PTA presidents were asked to submit two nominees per school (one primary and one alternate), with representation planned for the elementary and middle schools and four board members appointed by the board president. The presenters said the working timeline calls for the core team to begin meetings in November and meet monthly through May, with a typical commitment of about two hours per month.
Participants identified priorities during a group SWOT exercise. Strengths cited included faculty, community support and extracurricular programs; weaknesses included differentiation in instruction, facility needs and heavy state testing; opportunities included grant funding and local business partnerships; threats included overdevelopment and gaps in special-education funding and McKinney‑Vento supports.
District staff asked the community to submit the values inventory and said survey responses would be compiled for the first core-team session. Panacucci said the planning process aims to create measurable, observable indicators of success that staff and the community can track over time.
The presenters asked residents who want to serve to pursue nomination through their PTA or union representatives and said more communications — including a district website tab and social feeds — would provide updates. The meeting closed after an invitation to complete the survey and information about next steps.

