Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Buffer Zones topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs buffer zones and Master Plan role amid possible lakeside development
Summary
Members and a resident discussed using the Master Plan to create buffer zones near a potential northeast lakeside development; commissioners disagreed on whether zoning parcels can be confined and whether mixed-use areas should remain available for development.
At the Jan. 12, 2026 meeting, members of the Architectural Review Board/Plan Commission and a resident discussed whether the village should codify buffer zones to constrain new development, particularly on the northeast side of the lake.
Member Barbara Ruege suggested treating the Master Plan as a "living document" and asked the commission to consider placing restrictions or limitations on development by establishing buffer zones. Resident Mike Cofta told the commission he supports buffer zones to protect lakeside areas but also favors responsible development and asked for clarity on where developments would end. Member Dave Borchardt said mixed-use areas such as Carroll, Allen and Butler streets should remain available for development. Member Steven Masslich said he does not believe the commission can legally confine zoning to particular parcels. Member John Schluechtermann reminded the group that current plans label areas as residential but do not distinguish among R-1 through R-6 categories, and he cautioned that future boards could change any decision.
The minutes record the discussion and public comment but do not show a final decision; members asked for further consideration and listed buffer zones among topics that may return to a future agenda.
