Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Funeral Directors Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs first funeral‑directors fee increase since 2002 to restore board solvency

Joint Government Operations Committee · June 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee recommended a fee increase for the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers to meet a statutory self‑sufficiency requirement; the department said the adjustment is projected to keep the board solvent through 2032 and rejected a phased increase proposed by a committee member.

The Joint Government Operations Committee on June 17 recommended that the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers adopt a package of fee increases designed to return the board to a financially self‑sufficient position.

Reid Witcher, assistant commissioner for regulatory boards at the Department of Commerce and Insurance, told the committee the proposed increase is the board’s first since 2002 and that prior decreases (including one in 2018) underscored the need to restore reserves. "The proposed fees will allow the board to remain self sufficient through at least 2032," Witcher said. The department set an effective date of July 1 to allow licensees to renew at the old rate before the change takes effect.

A committee member (speaker 5) asked whether a phased series of smaller increases would be more manageable for small businesses than a large one‑time jump; Witcher said committee guidance requires fee increases only after programs meet specific fiscal criteria — multiple years operating in the red and reserve balances below one year of expenditures — and that the board has now met those criteria, prompting a single increase projected across two licensure cycles.

The committee moved and seconded a motion for a positive recommendation. The transcript records roll‑call votes in the senate in which at least two senators registered no votes during numbered roll calls; the chair announced the committee had a positive recommendation to move the rule forward. The measure will proceed through the regular legislative process for final action.

The committee did not receive public comment during its consideration of the rule.