Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement And Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts consent calendar items amid public questions on Oracle contract, Staples purchase order and bus bridge funding
Summary
The board approved its consent calendar and pulled items B7, B8, B9, C2 and C4 for discussion; after staff replies, the board approved the items 5‑0. Public commenters raised concerns about data privacy in an Oracle public‑safety contract, a Staples purchase order just below the $200,000 reporting threshold, and signage/funding questions on a transit bus bridge project.
The Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors on July 7 approved the consent calendar, including previously pulled items after public comment and staff responses.
The chair noted five consent items were pulled for comment and public speakers raised questions. Ron McMurtry asked about a public safety systems agreement with Oracle, warning of data‑collection risks and noting ransomware concerns. He also questioned a retroactive increase to a Staples blanket purchase order cited on the agenda as below the $200,000 threshold and asked whether that was intentional to avoid a board review. McMurtry asked if a Staples vendor or department had structured purchases to stay beneath reporting thresholds.
Staff and department directors responded during the meeting. Public Works Director Dave Lehman clarified that C4, the StanRTA bus bridge service item, covered two years (104 weeks) of funding. The chair and staff committed to look up details on the purchase‑order threshold and to provide answers before the meeting adjourned; staff later completed review and the consent items were approved by a 5‑0 vote.
The board’s action included approval to amend an agreement with Oracle of America for public safety–related systems, a retroactive increase to a Staples purchase order, and two years of funding for a bus bridge service operated by StanRTA; the transcript records the public concerns and staff commitments to follow up before and after the vote.
Public comment also covered broader topics such as zoning and economic development, sidewalk accessibility for people who use wheelchairs, and local fire and code enforcement issues; staff said they would follow up by referral to appropriate departments.
