Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances first-reading policies tied to Act 57 after debate over examples of boundary invasions
Summary
The board moved four policy updates (12-13, 32-13, 42-13 and 84-62) to a second reading after discussion about draft language listing examples of 'boundary invasions' and whether examples (hugging, high-fives) could be misinterpreted; the board voted to advance the policies for a second reading.
Get email alerts on the Policy Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the March 9 meeting the West Salem Board moved several policy updates to a second reading that originate from Act 57, after an extended discussion about sample language describing inappropriate physical contact and indicators of grooming.
An administrator explained that policies 12-13 (student supervision and welfare), 32-13 (professional staff), and 42-13 (support staff) have parallel language and incorporate draft notes provided by the district's policy vendor (Neola). The notes include a non-exhaustive list of "boundary invasions"—for instance hugging, kissing, or other physical contact—and state that "such behaviors may be indicators of grooming" and would be subject to investigation.
Board members questioned whether including specific examples could lead to misinterpretation (for instance, treating routine gestures like high-fives or fist bumps as violations). Several members argued that the paragraph framing those examples already explains that prohibited behavior lacks a clear educational or medical justification and that examples are intended to guide, not to create automatic violations. One board member said examples are useful because, "if any of these behaviors exhibited...could they have done that?" and urged caution in wording.
After the discussion a board member moved and a second was provided to advance the policy updates from first to second reading; the motion passed. The board did not adopt final policy language at the meeting but directed staff to prepare the materials for the second reading.
The policies include mandatory language required under Act 57 and additional reporting requirements; administrators said they consulted Neola and legal vetting during drafting.

