Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer seeks variances and asks council to lock water tap pricing for new subdivision
Summary
A presenter proposing a new subdivision asked the council to consider variances for street widths and drainage, and requested that the city lock in water tap pricing for a multi-year period to protect development margins; council discussed legal limits and favored case-by-case consideration.
A presenter seeking approval for a multi-lot subdivision described the planned housing (three-bedroom, two-bath units with multi-vehicle driveways), options to reduce construction costs, and asked the council to consider two variances: narrower street widths and curb-cut placement on lot lines.
The presenter also asked the council to "lock in my water prices on hookups" for the development to avoid future material or rate increases that would make the project financially unviable. The presenter said: "I would probably have to ask if I could get a way to lock in my water prices on hookups," and suggested a five-year window as a possible compromise.
Council and staff responses: Staff explained legal limits on binding future councils, noting "we can't lock in future boards" and that while a recommendation could be made, a subsequent board could change terms. Staff also provided current tap fee information: "Right now, if we tap it, it's $3.75 plus material," with an example that materials could make the effective cost about $1,500.
Drainage and design issues: Engineers and council discussed stormwater options (open roadside ditches versus storm boxes priced in the transcript as "$3,000 a piece" and pipe costs cited as "$30 a foot"), rip-rap for creek protection, and a plan to clean and maintain the existing creek and ditches to improve flow. The presenter emphasized options to keep home prices lower if certain public improvements were avoided or handled privately.
Action and next steps: Council approved the first three subdivision requests during the meeting and left the tap-pricing and variance requests for case-by-case consideration. The council recommended staff follow up on engineering specifics and to return with clarified variance language and potential terms for any tap-pricing arrangement.
Quotation highlights: "I would probably have to ask if I could get a way to lock in my water prices on hookups," Presenter. "Right now, if we tap it, it's $3.75 plus material," Staff member.
The council asked staff and the planning/zoning representatives to prepare more precise language on variances and to identify what could be acted on administratively versus what requires formal ordinance or policy changes.
