Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Warner Select Board votes not to recommend 4% tax-cap citizen petition after hearing

Warner Select Board · February 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing on Feb. 17, the Warner Select Board voted 2-1 not to recommend a citizen petition to cap year-over-year local tax increases at 4%, with residents noting most tax growth stems from school costs and state revenue changes.

The Warner Select Board on Feb. 17 heard public comment on a citizen petition to adopt RSA 32:5-b and limit year-over-year increases in the amount raised by local property taxes to 4%, then voted 2-1 not to recommend the measure to voters.

During the public hearing, resident Bob LaFrance asked whether the proposed 4% cap would apply annually. Select Board member Mike Smith replied that he reads the petition as preventing a budget that increases the amount to be raised by local taxes by more than 4% from the prior fiscal year. Resident James Sherman presented data saying Warner’s own portion of the tax rate rose far less than the school portion in recent years, stating that "from 2015 through 2025 the overall expenses in Warner increased annually 1.89% and capital increased 3%" and that the school portion of the tax rate increased about 76% over that period while the town’s portion rose about 23%.

Seidel and Hanson said they shared concerns about unintended impacts on town services if a strict cap were adopted. After discussion, the Board recorded a recommendation of “Not recommend” by roll call: Alfred Hanson — not recommend; Harry Seidel — not recommend; Mike Smith — recommend. The Select Board formally closed the public hearing at 6:24 PM.

Why it matters: Supporters of the petition said a cap would restrain future tax increases; opponents and some board members said the town’s limited control over school and state-driven components of the tax rate could leave municipal services vulnerable if revenue were constrained. The issue will appear on the annual warrant for town meeting consideration.

What’s next: The Select Board’s recommendation will be included with the warrant materials for the March 2026 town meeting vote.