Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lot Unmerger topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan Commission forwards positive recommendation for unmerger at 235 and 0 Beckwith Street
Summary
After public objections about density and stormwater, the Plan Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the zoning board for applications to unmerge lots and permit a new dwelling at 235 and 0 Beckwith Street; staff argued the proposal fits the comprehensive plan.
The Cranston Plan Commission voted to forward positive recommendations to the zoning board on applications to unmerge two parcels at 235 Beckwith Street and 0 Beckwith Street and allow a new single-family dwelling on the smaller lot.
Attorney Richard Pasha, representing Lenota Construction, said the combined property totals approximately 10,000 square feet and that the proposed new single-family dwelling on the 5,000-square-foot parcel would be consistent with neighborhood densities. "We feel it's consistent with the neighborhood, consistent with the comprehensive plan," Pasha said.
Planning staff presented a review that found the application consistent with the future land-use map and the B-1 zoning district. Staff noted nearby parcels with similar or higher densities and recommended positive findings for both ZDR applications.
Neighbor Elizabeth Guest urged the commission to deny the request, saying the proposal "violates the core intent of Cranston zoning ordinances" and warning of parking, runoff, and neighborhood-character impacts. Guest also argued the application represented a self-created hardship and did not meet the "least relief necessary" standard under former law.
Applicant counsel and staff disputed those claims at the hearing. Pasha said public-safety and parking concerns were not substantial: "I don't believe this compromises the public safety at all," he said, and noted the proposal includes on-site parking arrangements and easements. Commissioners and the solicitor discussed recent state-law changes that altered how certain hardship and lot-size standards apply; the commission emphasized that its vote was a recommendation to the zoning board, which will hold the final hearing.
The commission's positive recommendation means the zoning-board hearing will consider the full application, including any technical testimony and conditions the zoning board may impose.
